|
|
|
|
Tools
for Sustainability: Development and
Application of an Integrated Framework (SusTools) Research project of EC DG
Research 1 March 2003 – 31 October
2004
Objectives and Problems to be solvedThe objectives are: 1) Develop integrated
approach to assess, in a consistent and
comprehensive manner, the numerous complex tradeoffs involved in
environmental policies.
This approach will use elements of life cycle analysis, sustainability
indicators, impact
pathway analysis, risk analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and
multi-criteria analysis (MCA); 2) Test this approach with
2 case studies, to evaluate the
environmental and socio-economic consequences of possible policies in
the EU: Reducing the
impacts of nitrate fertilizer, and Examining the options for treating
municipal solid
waste; 3) Involve the stakeholders
(via e-mail and workshops) to
determine weighting factors for the MCA and disseminate the results; 4) Implement the approach
in Eastern Europe. Reports and PresentationsThese reports from the SusTools team are available for download (in pdf):
Description of WorkThe study, by a
multidisciplinary team with a long experience
in working together on environmental problems, will begin by reviewing
the advantages and
limitations of several tools commonly used for the appraisal of
environmental policy
– life cycle assessment (LCA), impact pathway analysis (IPA), life
cycle impact
assessment (LCIA), risk analysis (RA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA),
sustainability
indicators, and multi-criteria analysis (MCA). Problems
that may arise in their use will be identified. Based on this review an
integrated framework will be developed
that can be applied in a coherent manner to a wide range of policy
issues. The key steps are:
(1) for each policy option
under consideration, define system
boundaries and perform LCA; (2) quantify physical
impacts and external costs (using IPA
results of the ExternE project series, making new calculations as
necessary; (3) obtain data on
abatement costs; (4) make indicative
estimates of induced costs, using
partial-equilibrium analyses; (5) perform a CBA,
comparing the quantified costs and benefits
of the policy options; (6) perform a MCA with the
main steps:
The key idea of the
integrated approach is to assess costs and
benefits (CBA), based on a combination of LCA and IPA, supplemented by
stakeholder
involvement and MCA to take into account impacts that could not be
monetized. The proposed framework will be
tested with two
case studies, to evaluate the consequences of possible policies in the
EU, at EU and local
level:
The framework will also be
implemented and tested in four
countries of Eastern Europe: Bulgaria, the
Czech Republic, Poland and Romania. Contract and Partners Contract:
EVG3-CT-2002-80010 EC Scientific
Officer Marialuisa
Tamborra Phone:
+ 32 2 295 0312 Fax: + 32 2
296 3024 e-mail:
marialuisa.tamborra@cec.eu.int Coordinator Dr.
Ari Rabl ARMINES/Ecole
des Mines de Paris Centre Energétique et Procédés Boulevard
Saint-Michel 60 F-75272
Paris Phone:
+ 33 1 4051 9152 Fax:
+ 33 1 4634 2491 e-mail: ari.rabl@ensmp.fr Partners Prof. Danae
Diakoulaki diak@orfeas.chemeng.ntua.gr Laboratory of
Industrial and Energy Economics, National
Technical
University of Athens, Greece Dr. Tim J
Taylor T.Taylor@bath.ac.uk Department of
Economics and International Development, University of
Bath, UK Dr. Rudi
Torfs rudi.torfs@vito.be VITO, Mol,
Belgium Dr Mike
Holland mike.holland@emrc.co.uk EMRC Reading, UK Dr. Milan
Scasny Milan.Scasny@czp.cuni.cz, and Jan
Kovanda jan.kovanda@czp.cuni.cz Environment
Center,
Charles University Prague, Czech
Republic Georges
Valentis georges.valentis@institutve.org, Institut
Vivendi
Environment, Paris, France Prof.
Dimcho Boyadjiev boiadjiev@icsr.bas.bg Institute of
Control
and System Research, Bulgarian
Academy of Sciences, Sofia,
Bulgaria |
|||||||||||||||||||||||